SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB
ZEN.V 1.0000.0%Dec 24 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
BNStrader
cbs12311
Glorieux
LTGoldBull2
To: the Chief who wrote (5471)12/8/2015 9:38:42 AM
From: formerTN4 Recommendations   of 5988
 
Oh oh can I field this....
"and you will find both Olga and Bruce hard at work(POSTING BB'S). I judge people by what they produce"
So far the dynamic duo have produced NOTHING but DUSTERS! LOL LOL Oh and MARBLE LOL LOL
next..."do you know if ZEN can produce 99.9% at production levels yet?"
According to Chahar at the AGM not only should we be able to achieve this, but without a Caustic Bake, allow me to elaborate....no gas pipeline/minimal environmental footprint, not to mention a WAYYYY lower capex, which will most likely be funded by Gov.
So the_Thief... how many times do you bake your....scratch that, you DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO BAKE! You azzclown Canada NON Carbon geniuses would beg to have a petri dish full.
By the way, not for nothing, but when Charar was asked about reaching higher purity, it was said to be very easy, BUT with exorbitant cost involved and a very tiny market that takes a longggg longggg time to break into, and that's if you have a resource...UNLIKE that POC stock that your pushing on your sheep. So we will just sell TONNES of 99.9 in our sweet-spot(where the demand is).

the_Thief is DESPERATE look at all the posts...LOL

Good job BRUCEY, you better get all your dancing monkeys working overtime, ZEN is on the loose!

CHOO CHOO!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext