ZEN vs CCB Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB

ZEN.V 1.000

0.0%

Dec 24 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: clear who wrote (5487)	12/8/2015 9:41:05 AM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) of 5988

Again you speak from no knowledge. The reason that natural vein was never proposed as a synthetic replacement was because the only deposit that existed was Sri Lanka and they could not guarantee consistency in their graphite. Sri Lanka can produce 95% as easily as 99.99% ZEN is the first deposit of vein (some question that but I will not) of size. Therefore it has an opportunity due to its size of competing in the synthetic arena. So far we have seen ZEN samples range from 99% to 99.99% which appears to be fine for competing in the synthetic arena. However, to assume that those numbers in a petri dish are going to be the same numbers in production is a very very very large risk at this point. Ballard is working with something that even ZEN states is NOT a significant size sample. So for you to assume you have Ballard endorsement at Production throughput purity is naive' and is a lie. Just as if I assumed without a doubt CCB has 100K tons of Graphite that would be a lie. So I speculate 100K tons at .53% or higher grade, but I caveat that with "but we have no resource". Thats the "risk caveat". Show me one person on this board that includes the ZEN risk caveat? PLEASE?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next