Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

jlallen

TideGlider

TopCat

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (907294)	12/10/2015 4:04:31 PM
From: Bill	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 1573430

First, Trump's proposal, while a bit crude, is perfectly constitutional. The US has the legal authority to admit or deny entrance to any foreigner it chooses on any basis, religion included. First Amendment protections are not applicable and any challenge on that basis would be easily defended. Second, Trump's proposal was for a temporary halt, a pause, in order for the congress to better assess the problem and devise a legislative response. Third, I would have preferred Trump limit the scope of the ban to certain countries, rather than a religion. That's what Jimmy Carter did and hardly anyone noticed or complained.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next