The Donald Trump Presidency Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Donald Trump Presidency

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (4688)	12/11/2015 6:36:35 PM
From: John	4 Recommendations Recommended By Honey_Bee pogbull Qualified Opinion slowmo Read Replies (1) of 74570

I would like for any leftist Democrat (or establishment RINO) to explain to everyone what is different between the UN declaring strict sanctions against an entire country, and Trump suggesting that Muslim immigration be banned until the government can determine how to solve the problem of Muslim terrorism. Consider both cases. When the UN adopts sanctions against a regime and its country, millions of innocent people are punished along with the guilty despot(s) in the regime. Such UN sanctions are quite routine. How is this practice deemed acceptable (which, in my opinion it's not only acceptable, but it doesn't go nearly far enough), whereas Trump's plan to protect America from Muslims is deemed unacceptable by the same fools who support UN sanctions? The bottom line is that anyone who supports UN sanctions against entire nations, but opposes Trump's plan to halt Muslim immigration is not only a fool, but is also intellectually dishonest and hypocritical.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next