Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 322.34

+1.1%

Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Thai Chung who wrote (13841)	12/24/1997 8:57:00 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (2) of 70976

"When investors come back to the group, the first stock they'll come back to is Applied," says analyst Milind Bedekar of Prudential Securities in San Francisco, who rates the stock a "buy" with a 12-month price target of $ 41. "We see Applied as a powerhouse equipment company ... viewed as a proxy for growth for the industry," says Mr. Deahna, who rates the stock a "strong buy" with a 12-month price target of $40. Are these guys serious?? They rate the stock a STRONG BUY yet have a price target only $9 away from where it was earlier this week. If indeed they only saw appreciation of $9 on a stock with as much volatility as AMAT, why would they rate it STRONG BUY?? Just doesn't sound right ot me.... In addition, these guys in their offices on Wall Street have a better view of the market than AMAT mgt.?!?! The article says that EPS forecasts were slashed to $1.79, even though mgt maintains is eps forecast of $2.08-$2.15. Let me see, who should we believe..... Reminds me of a quote from W. Buffet something to the effect of: "analysts on WS are no more than manic-depressives in expensive suits." That is not the exact quote; if anyone knows the one I am speaking of, please post. Later in the article: But he contends that fearful investors have meted out too harsh a punishment on Applied's stock price. If indeed too harsh a punishment has been meted out(which I agree with) then what they are saying implicitly is that AMAT should be trading near, if not on top of their 12 mo. price projection. This would imply that AMAT's 12 mo. price projection should be significantly higher than the one they forecast. Do these guys even listen to themselves???? Regards, Brian

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next