ZEN vs CCB Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB

ZEN.V 1.000

0.0%

Dec 24 12:03 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

From: rennie69	12/18/2015 4:13:46 PM
	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 5988

The chemist wanna-be over at Stockhouse is trying to convince ‘who knows who’ that synthetic is no longer used as a component in Fuel Cells. Hoov’s quote: "As you'll see, synthetic graphite has been shuffled off to the sidelines, some time ago. It begs the question as to why ZEN is comparing to synthetic in their last press release. A quote from Zen’s last press release: “Ballard recently prototyped GDLs with Albany graphite samples provided by Zenyatta. Ballard also made GDLs with benchmark *(synthetic)* graphite material currently in use today. Both GDLs were constructed using Ballard’s proprietary process to ensure a fair comparison. To date, all the properties of the GDL sample made with Zenyatta graphite were essentially identical to those of the benchmark GDL in all the functional tests that have been completed.” Ballard is using synthetic graphite material yet Hoov says it was sidelined some time ago. Now who do you believe? A leading company in Fuel Cell technology or a wanna-be-chemist who’s bitterly seeking revenge and will never understand all his problems are derived from his own personal inadequacies?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next