SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board
ZEN.V 1.0000.0%Dec 24 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: NuclearCrystals12/19/2015 10:43:35 AM
Read Replies (2) of 12350
 
D02-F0 Subcommittee on Manufactured Carbon and Graphite Products, has only 32 active standards under jurisdiction right now.

The purpose of the latest presser was to update investors on the status of the testing undertaken to establish the datasets required for review by the subcommittee.

The focus on the invitation to join the committee certainly shows the level of intellect of those who are doing so and using that to characterize the presser as fluff.

The standards established in this category are very few. Miller graphite has been fast tracked through testing considering samples were sent in September.

So where Zennanites used to argue getting certified for Nuclear takes years and years and years ............. the presser illustrated that in the case of Miller graphite, years have been reduced to months.

The presser did not suggest that certification had been received, nor did the presser suggest joining the subcommittee has any influence on acceptance for certification. Whomever invited the Canada Carbon Inc representatives to join obviously did so with the knowledge of what Miller graphite was all about, after all, that is why the company was in attendance at the conference in the first place ............. to represent Miller graphite as the best in available Nuclear qualifying natural graphite.

Four of the best labs in the world dealing in Nuclear graphite worked over Miller graphite with numerous varying methods, all was done at no cost to Canada Carbon Inc and no government money was paid to the entities to do so either ............... that says a lot considering the same can't be said for any of the work done on Albany graphite. If it wasn't Zenyatta paying then it was government grants they applied for but directed to the entities playing with the Albany boutique amorphous graphite. Albany graphite was not special enough for any lab to front the costs of testing it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News