SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dividend investing for retirement

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Max Fletcher who wrote (24097)12/25/2015 3:23:32 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) of 34328
 
conspicuously high fees, even as investor returns have faltered.


PSEC's returns are fine, they used to pay $1.31 per year, then reduced it to $1.00 per year this year.

The main thing that has faltered is the share price, and that's out of PSEC management's control.

As long as PSEC pays $1.00 per year, an $11.00 share price seems fair (9% yield, why not?).

As for management fees being too high, sure, management fees for many big companies seem too high. What can we shareholders do about that?

There has been some activism in the BDC sector (TICC particularly) where another asset manager has offered to manage the portfolio for lower fees. Hopefully the same activism will hit ALL the BDCs over the next couple of years. But that's sort of our of the hands of us shareholders, and PSEC management isn't stupid, as long as they're getting paid well they aren't supposed to request to reduce their own salaries, are they?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext