SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB
ZEN.V 0.920+5.7%12:55 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mister D who wrote (5738)12/30/2015 12:00:34 PM
From: RuddyMongoose4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Mister D
rennie69
specboy2012
Zengold

  Read Replies (2) of 5988
 
Mister D, based upon the information in that article, it would not be unreasonable to conclude that the Miller property is not economically viable for graphite mining and that would explain why CCB is trying to salvage the project by proposing to operate a marble quarry with graphite recovery as a secondary product.

Until CCB produces the 43-101/PEA/PFS/BFS combined document that Chief promised for September 2015, we will just have to assume the worst case scenario that the Miller project is not economical.

If CCB shareholders still want to invest in a graphite project with significant potential upside, they should consider moving their investment to ZEN. As an added bonus, the ZEN shareholders are a lot nicer people with whom to be associated as fellow investors.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News