CCB vs ZEN truth board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board

ZEN.V 1.120

-1.8%

Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: the Chief who wrote (1314)	12/30/2015 4:59:01 PM
From: NuclearCrystals	Read Replies (1) of 12350

Eveleigh and Allan have access to reports that are not public. Acting in the open market to purchase shares immediately prior to releasing good data would obviously be a no no, however, taking down options that are due to expire would not fall under that type of scrutiny as the timing would not be a factor of acting on that undisclosed information. The flip side of this which would not attract any scrutiny would be letting cheap options die while well in the money. If some poor data was reported after the expiration of that cheap paper, it would certainly explain why the paper was left to die but wouldn't compromise any ethical duty. The question arises, is there more bad data to come out of the woodwork? Ben Gurion fail like the SFU researcher? Ballard come across some poor performance aspects ? What's that saying? Many reasons to sell but only one reason to buy. Only problem .............. Eveleigh and Allan couldn't rationalize one reason to buy.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next