SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB
ZEN.V 1.0000.0%Dec 24 12:03 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GrumpyGus who wrote (5774)1/2/2016 9:44:32 PM
From: Jayfish3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Clyde Spaulding
helo4
Mister D

  Read Replies (2) of 5988
 
G Gys your right this is a zen & Ccb board. Comments on both are fair game.

It might seem repetition but how can you ignore the failure to release drill results for 3 years?
The only ones released support Givernment reports of the geology that record small pods of good graphite.
There is no evidence what so ever to support deposit of any size .

You realize that Zen has a large deposit of hydrothermal graphite as confirmed by independent academics .
This was validated further by RPA " a totally independent engineering firm.

Zen has developed a marketing strategy targeting the largest users of high grade graphite .
To date it appears that they have proven that Zen natural graphite is a suitable replacement for synthetic graphite.

I haven't seen a single challenge to that claim except by the pseudo experts on these boards Do you dispute the findings of Dr.Conly ,Dr. Rajesh Bashyam of Ballard,Dr. Oren Regev, and Dr. Ilan Pribar of Ben Gurion University.
I didn't even include the opinions of Dr. Chahar due to his position at Zen. However his vast experience and contacts in the synthetic graphite sector cannot be dismissed.

How do you explain the findings of these distinguished and learned men? They have each described the Zen Graphite as being superior to the graphite currently been used?

In defence of CCB I cannot dispute the purity results released, however the cost process to achieve high purity is unknown .

The lack of any drill results is an overwhelming negative. An equation lacking a key variable cannot lead to a sum
A+?=?

In my opinion Zen has made its case for success whereas CCB has not offered a similar case
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News