SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB
ZEN.V 1.0000.0%Dec 24 12:03 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
hoperrs
To: Jayfish who wrote (5776)1/2/2016 10:03:13 PM
From: GrumpyGus1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 5988
 
Hey Jayfish, some good points there. As for it being comparable to synthetic, I have always figured ZEN's quality was top notch. But there are two points against that statement.
First, many flake deposits are getting synthetic quality graphite upon sphericalizing and coating, making them suitable for Li-ion batteries. Syrah has indicated a process that is economical for them, and they are planning a plant in North America to supply that type of graphite. And because of the vast amount of graphite they have, the waste is not critical. Plus they are pretty much ready to go, whereas ZEN will take 5+ years to get to production. If you're Tesla, would you wait that long when you plan to mass produce in the next year or two?
Second, ZEN's purity has regressed from 99.99+ to 99.94 in the PEA to 99.9 in recent news releases. That is not able to compete with synthetic in many of the pricier applications.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext