A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (40634)	1/7/2016 12:04:16 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 42652

>> I don't believe that for a moment. It's much more valuable as a fire-fanning weapon against the other guys. I believe there are a lot of Republicans who believe as I do, that the only way to deal with this law is to rip it out by its roots. True, they have nothing with which to replace it. But the "good" provisions are going to stick for good, which is a great success for Obama, but it should be done in some orderly way. While I don't like the direction Paul Ryan has started off, I understand why he has done it and he may be right. I believe he is a good man to straighten this mess out, if anyone can. And I don't agree that he wants it as a political weapon. Some do, but I don't think that's him. >> As we've said many times on this thread, once you put an entitlement program into place, the benefits become the new default. You can't just rip it out. You can if you put something in place as a transition rule for those who lose benefits. It is how it has to be done but I don't think it is that difficult to accommodate the situation.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next