SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board
ZEN.V 0.920-8.0%Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Shoto1/19/2016 3:47:25 PM
Read Replies (1) of 12350
 
Things moving along nicely:

"We note that a composite sample of Miller flotation concentrate analyzed by an independent laboratory (Evans Analytical Group) returned an Equivalent Boron Content less than five parts per million (ppm), indicating nuclear purity (graphite used for nuclear purposes must have little to no neutron-absorbing material, in particular boron). Also, thermally treated Miller graphite contains only a small fraction (0.99 ppm) of the contaminants (e.g., aluminum, calcium, titanium) when compared to the best natural graphite (36.55 ppm) assessed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 2011 for inclusion in their next generation nuclear reactor program. As well, the thermally treated Miller sample also had substantially lower contaminant levels than the best synthetic (4.53 ppm) and experimental (8.1 ppm) graphite samples."


Cited by Secutor - bonded member of IIROC, CIPF and FIB, and by Evans Analytical Group and Oak Ridge National Lab. (Oak Ridge National Lab - isn't that the one Zennanites were crowing about years back?)

Nothing, absolutely NOTHING else even comes close to CCB graphite - stated by them in print.

(Facts and numbers from professional engineers and scientists - not opinions of investors - just numbers)

Shoto
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext