SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board
ZEN.V 0.920+5.7%9:49 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Clyde Spaulding who wrote (3237)1/20/2016 5:18:46 PM
From: the Chief of 12350
 

Mr Chief is it true that the samples CCB have tested have only come from historical stockpiles or hand picked trenching samples and none of the drill core were used?


I would say thats mostly correct. They started off drilling, I did not like the stock for that reason. Then they went the way of Physpy and cross cuts. Since the change in direction they have dug huge trenches with hi-hoes. some as long as 125 feet long, 10 feet wide and 12 feet deep. Samples from these areas have been sent off and GDMS'd the last was a .53% sample from the trenching and it came in at 99.9995%
So I would say 99% are not from drill holes up till now. However the 43-101 which was made up from alot of drilling over the last 11 months will be based on drilling as well as open trench and channel sampling. There is no other way to quantify veining.

So if this is true none of the tests involved a true representation of graphite embedded in marble which would be more typical?

hmm not true, even the stockpiled stuff is graphite in Marble. I am not sure if we do have graphite in anything else but marble. except perhaps in the rip between the solid veins and the marble contact point.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext