How so, exactly? They didn't have superior products or Dell would have used them.
But you said that "When AMD has better products they prosper". And AMD was prospering, with their Hammer products that were widely acknowledged to be superior to Intel's long-in-the-tooth, reactionary, marketing-driven architectures. (I.e. Netburst, "Yamhill".)
Was AMD prospering for some other reason now? Is that your new excuse?
You also said that Dell didn't use AMD because it was simply "too late in the product cycle", and that "in retrospect, Dell made a mistake." Why are you directly contradicting you own statements?
Answer: Because you spew BS constantly and can't keep track of your own lies.
Can you tell me what the point is in this continued bickering on your part? It always ends poorly for you. LOL if this is what you call "ending poorly" I have no problem with it. Seems like you are having trouble dealing honestly and rationally with this topic.
I thought we were starting a dialog here with your retroactive trades. You just can't quit layering on the BS, can you? Your passive-aggressive schtick is so transparent; I'm calling your bluff: Point to one of these alleged "retroactive trades".
(I'll call you a liar again when you can't.)
Ahhh screw it, why wait for the inevitable? YOU ARE A PUNK LIAR WITH ZERO CREDIBILITY. Note that this is NOT an groundless personal attack, it is a VERIFIABLE FACT.
I've posted exactly two trades on this board in the last ~5 years, trades which I posted in real-time: One at $2.10 (day's range: $1.98-$2.17), and one at $1.67 (day's range, $1.66-$1.73).
BTW, do I need to point to the dozens of posts where my supposed "retroactive trades" were all the proof you needed for your pathetic, and in hindsight INCREDIBLY ANTI-PROFITABLE back-slapping episodes with MM? Indeed, my second trade was DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE (and I explicitly did attribute it) to one of these trolling sessions...
I guess that's just one example of things "ending poorly" for me? LOL
fpg |
