As posted before, you can "make up" anything on the Internet. You tried that tactic with your "defense" of the "middleman thingy". AFAIK, you can't go back in time and manufacture posts, posts to which you yourself responded. In context. Multiple times.
Maybe in Elmerland you can. Here in the real world? No.
You may be able to claim that I misrepresented a trade...
Which I did. On purpose. The fact of which I encoded into the misrepresentation itself.
In more than one way, including way(s) which I have not divulged yet.
(I'm just waiting for you dishonest SOBs to dig your hole even deeper. And then deeper once again.)
Yes, that's a code, with which I will slap you... Later.
(And the best thing is, even if you dopes figure out my trivial little code (which you won't), you'll just be succumbing to my original goal of merely acknowledging my actual $1.67 trade.)
How deep must the hatred go, that you're both willing to defend this particular (and super-idiotic) line-in-the-sand, to the death...
Is it just that I made a good call on AMD? Or the fact that it was MM's gloating that prompted my buy? Seriously, WHAT IS YOUR MAJOR MALFUNCTION?
fpg
PS: Hey Elmer, what did you mean when you said, "In retrospect, Dell made a mistake?"
LMFAO |
