Me: false trades that are explained away as typo's embedded in secret codes, traps, and fiddles?
You: There you go again, lying and running and crying but implying you're actually a winner.
The post I was referring to: Do you dispute my recent well-documented $1.12 AMD trade
Your followup claiming it was a typo: Damn smartphone touchscreen, maybe I typed it wrong.
So clearly you posted a false trade, which I pointed out and then you claimed it was a typo and maybe it was but later you claimed you intentionally post typos as a secret code to entrap your enemies. Like anyone cares...
In the future you should quote the entire statement rather than deleting the part that puts it in perspective.
A) I.e. the context* in the post you referenced (but for some reason couldn't just supply a link to, surprise surprise, because somebody might actually FOLLOW it and realize how full of s**t you are), and
B) you're outright ignoring the context of the entire thread, in which I'm repeatedly ridiculing you SOBs for your persistent inability to reference the actual trade I had no problem linking to, despite my "clear" intent to deceive?
You really cannot detect any hint of sarcasm at all when I (Mr. So-Called Write-Your-Thesis-On-A-Smartphone) said, "Damn smartphone touchscreen, maybe I typed it wrong?"
No sarcasm in, "Whatever are you talking about?"
What did you think the footnote:
"* LOL you SOBs simply can't acknowledge it, can you? Run like the wind, you intellectually dishonest COWARDS!",
(referring to)
"Do you dispute my recent well-documented $1.12 AMD trade*"
(original link intact, BTW) was actually about?
Why would I ask, "Do you dispute my...trade?" if I wasn't fully aware of and indeed anticipating your feigned "concern?"
In a response where I demonstrate an awareness of your (feigned) concern over the accuracy of my reference to a (linked) posted trade, why would I double down and create an even MORE inaccurate reference to the trade, WHILE LINKING TO THE REAL ONE...
...WHILE CALLING YOU AN SOB TO YOUR FACE YET AGAIN OVER YOUR INABILITY TO ACKNOWLEDGE MY TRADE?
Are you going to sit here and tell me you believe I wasn't fully aware of every single character I typed?
Is your skull so thick that hitting you on the head with a literal Clue Bat would have no effect on you?
Are you autistic? Your only possible excuse is that you have a serious comprehension defect... Any normal person looking at your characterization of this supposedly damning post would roll it up and smack you in the face with it for being such an idiot.
fpg
PS: How'd you like Sally Sobstory's MiddleMan backfire? Insane, AMIRITE? Betting anything you can't recognize the reality check...
*The context:
| To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274690) | 1/28/2016 10:39:35 PM | | From: fastpathguru | Read Replies (1) of 274786 | | | You
| I wouldn't expect that to ever stop. I don't think he even realizes he's doing it. |
| |
What ever are you talking about? Do you dispute my recent well-documented $1.12 AMD trade* prompted by MM's Sally Sobstory post?
fpg
* LOL you SOBs simply can't acknowledge it, can you? Run like the wind, you intellectually dishonest COWARDS! |
|
|
