Miller vs Albany ......... where the truth lies or the lie i Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Miller vs Albany ......... where the truth lies or the lie i

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (27)	2/7/2016 1:05:39 AM
From: LearntoTrade	Read Replies (1) of 70

He need this because obviously, he is in deep and the trades have not worked out to reduce the losses. Should have kept some CCB too. And zen chart looks nasty. As has been stated, CCB's real challenge will be that of proving the resource, but that doesn't mean they can't proceed with a smaller scale plant of 1500 tonnes to start. Another puzzle for me is real cost to market. What we do know is the thermal cost would be substantially lower due to 1) lower hydro KW/h price in Quebec and 2) a starting higher grade after floatation. CCB's graphite has a real advantage in that the impurities are on the surface of the graphite rather than embedded. Also noteworthy is attraction rather than promotion. CCB has the right people in place with all the connections to nuclear applications. Zen's 'real' problem is the lack of pilot plant data. G actually admitted as much when he said funds needed for full pilot plant. Of course zen woes also appear to be metallurgy issues, hence the merry-go-round pressers about all the little sample sets being auditioned. Funny how the releases always omit details for investors to access. Thus pro's stay clear because many of these juniors that have a deposit never get the project off the ground. The disinformation board sure helped zen, lol. After all, had they not had it out for chief fellow, the science, intuition and insight may not have been put out there. So they watch there chart scratching their heads. Of course G and a few others made the money. And GMP holds for what? A buy out? WAFJ! Show the world the flow sheet data. Give the processing data and losses, including re grind. Give the coating cost. Explain the $7500 PEA pricing used. Depending on their end user, they may discover the project is really upside down if the end user would rather process and coat themselves. Now what price do you get? One thing is abundantly clear. CCB's chart is looking mighty fine while zen's is not so pretty. Nor does zen offer liquidity and volume for traders. Bear trap in effect for zen. Said before and now again: "they short the pops". I hope this board adheres to the promise of no banning. But NC, do talk of CCB. Forget zen, unless disproving one of the idiots rumors, lol. Like ae in Japan? Was he there? I honestly don't know. Now one of ccb supporters suggesting he in NFLD. How do you know this? P

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next