SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Miller vs Albany ......... where the truth lies or the lie i
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: NuclearCrystals2/7/2016 12:45:23 PM
1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jiggydo

   of 70
 
Well known in every graphite circle that in order to get pricing a graphite must meet exacting customer specifications and be able to satisfy the customers demand on an annual basis.

Miller graphite is the only graphite within the current basket of junior company hopefuls that has met both criteria and thus been able to secure pricing specific to Miller graphite.

Albany graphite has not received a single nod by any of the supposed NDA holders and that is reflective of the requirement to meet the two criteria ............ Albany graphite simply hasn't done it because it can't thus far.

Talk of Graphene extended through Ben Gurion or Lakehead does not change the facts on pricing and in fact having an update on graphene come from Lakehead rather than Ben Gurion is not a good sign.

The familia should read that presser closely ............... Lakehead didn't advance anything, that's the problem.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News