First you misrepresent my post, then attack me for what I didn't say. Says the guy who has to selectively quote HIS OWN POST to make his "argument."
Q: Why is it that you can never link to the posts you're talking about or include full quotes, like I do all the time?
A: Because the only way you can argue is via deception.
if you think that:
'Notice the quote says "if you do so after the fact"' (Bold "if" in original)
accurately represents your ACTUAL STATEMENT:
"You can make a valuable contribution here documenting your gains and losses on AMD shares, even if you do so after the fact..." (Note the "even if" that was excluded from Elmer's self-quote)
then you are incapable of accurate and/or honest communication.
In the actual sentence, you are stating a belief about me. A false belief. A false belief that your subsequent, non-interrogative accusation reinforces.
Then you admit intentionally lying in your posts which, by implication, includes your original post. LOL! And here we go... In what way, specifically, is my "original post" lying?
That would be the "oblivious-rube interpretation", which (surprise surprise) ignores all context which defies your narrative, including the multiple unanswered requests to substantiate your accusation of posting "retroactive trades", the obvious sarcasm, the outright insults exposing your deceit, the multiple detailed documentaries of how I played you like a violin... The multiple unanswered requests for you to even acknowledge/discredit the contents of my "original post".
Then you admit introducing a secret code episode and more lies to try and cover your tracks after being caught. Don't you see that there was no need for you to lie in the first place if you hadn't misquoted me? Once you admitted lying, nothing you say afterwards can have any credibility. You didn't do yourself any favors with that secret code nonsense. You discredited everything you say when you admitted to intentionally inserting false statements. A) Isn't that just RICH, coming from the guy who MISQUOTED HIMSELF?
B) You mean that code you don't know or care about? That code again? LOL
Oh, and BTW: Where exactly is this post where I "misquoted" your "even if you..." post, a "misquote" that suddenly everything now hinges on? LINK PLEASE. (Prediction: <crickets>)
As for credibility: I put my record of "deceitful" trades in a nice list for you and the world to view. Full disclosure. In context. I'm not hiding from, or afraid of, ANYTHING. If you think it's such an issue, why don't you offer a line-by-line critique. Just be sure you don't leave any "context" out, including the links, and the "quotes" I "selected" (which highlight information you have repeatedly ignored/excluded), lest I have to slap you down AGAIN for doing so.
The record shows me exposing everything, and you hiding from and running away from everything including your own posts to the point where you have to post deceiving characterizations of YOUR OWN POSTS.
fpg
PS: Please tell me that you're not just angry that your own clumsy "smart guy" attempts to goad me into "trading retroactively" failed so miserably, even while I was (and still am) playing you and MM like marionettes... |
