SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Miller vs Albany ......... where the truth lies or the lie i
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tensane 1 who wrote (31)2/7/2016 4:07:13 PM
From: NuclearCrystals1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jiggydo

   of 70
 
Tensane1, childish is too soft a characterization of the familia. Take one FormerTN as an example, suspended from SI once again and one must assume it was for the ridiculous imagery and rhetoric he posted in attacking Bruce Duncan and Canada Carbon Inc.

Review that guys Twitter feed and the dialogue he has with Chris Parry from Stockhouse ........... Parry calls him a nut. FormerTN was booted from Stockhouse for multiple accounts ............ Thunderbaby being just one of the extras. The Thunderbaby persona was used to float a Tesla deal on the back of calling presser material before it was public in two instances.

Most recently the FormerTN persona was used to lend credence to the Japan pump by forwarding the exact details of a flight that Eveleigh supposedly boarded out of Pearson. Adding fine details like that to a pump ensure that the familia does not question the veracity of the pumped up story ......... it just sounds so accurate (nobody would make that shit up would they ............ lol)

To your point on Zennanites commenting on the differences between Miller and Albany graphite at the quality and performance level, of course they would deflect to calling into question a Miller resource rather than do that comparison.

Even on a resource basis they have no argument and the reason I say that is because it really is just a matter of simple math ............. and with that in hand, the no resource argument loses any credibility.

Investors only need to understand specific gravity, carbon content and concentration/purification proficiency in order to gain full confidence that a Miller resource will be significant as framed in an economics sense on a low tonnage high value business model.

Simply start cubing surface vein expression and apply the other parameters and you establish an undeniable resource. All doubt is removed except for those who remain ignorant of the present day and historic stockpiles currently catalogued on the property.

The question isn't whether there is a definable resource on the property. The question is what is the size of the initial resource that will be reported in establishing economic viability of the project.

All that is needed is a starter pit definition amongst a broader inferred resource.

The smaller scale of a starter pit would allow for fast track permitting which in turn allows for a quick path to cash flow and further mine advancement would come fully scalable to demand.

Modular design allows for rapid and cost effective scale up for all processing circuits involved.

Albany can never have the luxury of scaling in that manner simply because of the deposition model. With so much overburden and waste to deal with ........... they are stuck with all in from the beginning even if they are somehow able to figure out the metallurgical nightmare Albany is lumped with.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News