SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.91+0.9%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274887)2/10/2016 1:28:00 AM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
The one where butthurt Elmer bores me with another repetitive rube yawner...
You may be able to claim that I misrepresented a trade...

Which I did. On purpose. The fact of which I encoded into the misrepresentation itself.

In more than one way, including way(s) which I have not divulged yet.


Take that vacation. You hung yourself
Why are you posting things I've probably posted and/or linked to 10 times now, like it bothers me?

I did "misrepresent" a trade, as I A) linked to the real trade, and B) challenged you to correct me while calling you a cowardly SOB to your face.

You're not all upset about that code thing still, are you? Even after I put all the information you needed to recognize it right in front of your cowardly SOB face? You're going to claim, with a straight face, that the pattern (which you haven't recognized) doesn't exist? That there was no pattern in the numbers I chose? LOL!

Do you think my motive in misrepresenting the trade was to make you believe that I actually bought AMD at $1.12? I know you're not that oblivious (it's an act) and I know you know nobody else is either.

You're just a butthurt loser who can't acknowledge that your attack dog signalled a damn-near-perfect AMD minimum for me.

fpg

PS: If you're going to quote it, quote it!

To: Mahmoud Mohammed who wrote (274705)1/29/2016 8:51:53 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (3) of 274890
As posted before, you can "make up" anything on the Internet. You tried that tactic with your "defense" of the "middleman thingy".
AFAIK, you can't go back in time and manufacture posts, posts to which you yourself responded. In context. Multiple times.

Maybe in Elmerland you can. Here in the real world? No.

You may be able to claim that I misrepresented a trade... [notice the italics]

Which I did. On purpose. The fact of which I encoded into the misrepresentation itself.

In more than one way, including way(s) which I have not divulged yet.

(I'm just waiting for you dishonest SOBs to dig your hole even deeper. And then deeper once again.)

Yes, that's a code, with which I will slap you... Later.

(And the best thing is, even if you dopes figure out my trivial little code (which you won't), you'll just be succumbing to my original goal of merely acknowledging my actual $1.67 trade.)

How deep must the hatred go, that you're both willing to defend this particular (and super-idiotic) line-in-the-sand, to the death...

Is it just that I made a good call on AMD? Or the fact that it was MM's gloating that prompted my buy? Seriously, WHAT IS YOUR MAJOR MALFUNCTION?


fpg

PS: Hey Elmer, what did you mean when you said, "In retrospect, Dell made a mistake?"

LMFAO
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext