SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk
SOXL 41.75+8.2%Dec 19 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
toccodolce
To: smh who wrote (103760)2/11/2016 7:42:02 AM
From: OptionWritingBull1 Recommendation   of 207365
 
Well, no, actually da cheif is right, and it goes beyond what he said, which was factual.

In fact, not only could you (try to) tax the income of the top 1% at 100% but you could take 100% of their assets and it still wouldn't pay the tab.

Nobody ever argued that all assets were acquired on a level playing field.

Only YOU claimed lots of wealthy crooks (without proof) trying to set up YOUR simplistic straw-man. YOU threw that crap into the discussion.

Purveyors of really stupid straw-man arguments shouldn't throw stones that make them look really ignorant.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext