CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: angel who wrote (1657)	12/27/1997 3:48:00 PM
From: David Eddy	Read Replies (1) of 3391

Angel - Can you please explain why VIAS is not fully automated. Does that mean their and PTUS and SEEC technology is worse than CSGI? That is how I interpret your thoughts. I also interpret that you think those three companies did not spend enough time to become fully automated. Because it's not possible for anyone to fully automate this process. Even when we attempt to narrow the discussion to just focusing on the smallest & simplest step---code remediation/fixing---it is absolutely, positively impossible to fully automate fixing large amounts of code. Just cannot be done. The marketing types can claim 'fully automated' as much as they want... it's just not possible... there are just too many twists & turns in code. Real world example: I used to market a set of IBM mainframe code analysis tools. They read source code (COBOL programs, copybooks & JCL) into a central data dictionary/repository. Even after 12+ years in the field, it was our experience that when we installed these products at a new site, they would choke (blowup) on code features we'd never encountered before. That's just the nature of code. - David

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next