FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

FTEL 0.732

-10.6%

3:55 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Daine Newman who wrote (23694)	12/28/1997 8:38:00 AM
From: sdheart	Read Replies (3) of 41046

Daine, actually we are ahead of the synchronicity. What Mr.Russell, was refering to was the anticipation of filing the "first" 10Q. Not for the quarter that ended on 12/31/97 but, for the results he was giving in his statement. which were actually filed on 12/18/97. The Statement:We are once again on full reporting status with the SEC. This means that we will be reporting via 10Q and 10K documents, which will make it easier for us to keep you updated on what we are doing. We anticipate filing the first 10Q for the quarter ending December 31, 1997. What would have been more correct would have been for Mr.Russell, to say rather than ending should have read by 12/31/97. On a different note, I was asking myself a question this morning, If Lucent/Bell Labs, has deemed that we have the "best quality" and we actually offer some of the lowest costs per port, then why is the price still what it is? The only possible scenario I see is that someone wants me to not believe in FTEL, and I have to ask why? I came up with ~16-Million reasons. We are the *BARBARIANS* at the *GATE*. sdheart

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next