SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LiveLife who wrote (9913)3/11/2016 12:11:08 AM
From: louel2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Panthergirl
Underhill69

  Read Replies (1) of 10654
 
Nobody can sue anybody for a roll back. The management does it in the best interests of the shareholder majority. Only those underwater have a tendency to get burned. It has no affect on those at par. And is actually a benefit for the people who's ACB is in profit at the time of consolidation.

No contract guaranteeing a profit on warrants or shares purchased at higher prices is ever issued. It does not in any manner, represent any sort of fraudulent maneuver. And if it did require a vote, EE is the control person. No one else's permission is required.

It may never happen. They still have the secret amount they got paid for the Liard shares when they transferred them to the J/V. However much that is.

For the sake of those with losses in their positions it would be better not to. But if you look at the number occurring on the Venture exchange over the last year or two, it would not surprise me.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News