Zenyatta Free Speech Board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board

ZEN 77.48

0.0%

Nov 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: Myfreedom58 who wrote (7713)	3/13/2016 7:12:57 PM
From: NuclearCrystals	4 Recommendations Read Replies (3) of 22811

The entire "inferred" debate is complete bull shit just as the "indicative pricing" topic is. By your measure "technically feasible" describing the Albany process flowsheet means it is not a process at all. "Inferred" is a definable resource with limited inputs. "indicative pricing" is an actual quoted price for Miller quality graphite. "technically feasible process/flowsheet" is in fact a flowsheet that simply has no practical proofing done to validate it. If one of them amounts to "0" as you define it, then all of them do. In actual fact, the veracity of all three come acutely into play at the next level of progression for either project. In all categories listed above, Miller has the easiest path to tightening the proofs because the work has been completed in all categories already.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next