I don't have a problem with Pugs having brought forward such information. Just because I listen to Kugler doesn't mean everyone else should, and the best way for others to decide whether they should is to review his history.
I agree completely, he is a broker that attacks the people he claims he is here to save, he accuses them of being others, he posts irrelevant info about them for the purpose of harrassment, he keeps secrets and the only posts he ever gives us here or on ANY other thread are negative ones, very fishy to me, how about you?
I can't refute this at all. My only experiences with Mike have been when he has pointed out a negative about a company. He may have said positive things about other companies, but I haven't seen it
Me either, awfully FISHY isn't it, a broker should BUY and sell for his clients but Kugler always seems to go only ONE way, SELL and negative, think about my theory, Kugler is very good and has a lot of contacts and info and experience at his disposal for finding negative data. if he can find companies worthy of halting that the SEC has missed, he simply gathers his data, shorts it with his buddies, even if the longs do catch him he can turn his data into the SEC and the halt begins, he does not lie about fundamentals he knows before his very first post all the data he needs to enact a halt in a company, so he almost ALWAYS wins, and then people who got burned say, hey Kugler was right, that company was a sham, OF COURSE IT WAS, he already knew it, shorted it, and had the data necessary to halt it, I find it hard to believe Mike Kugler spends up to 8 hours a day here sometimes at his own personal loss to help me, I do find it believeable though that he slams many of these companies because THEY are trash and he knows it and he has already shorted it, he says his info is accurate, SURE IT IS, that is what he will need to get it halted, as much as he may be making you better well believe his info is accurate, is this illegal what I propose as a possible thoery? probably not, but it is highly unethical and it stinks.
In Mike's case, I have always found that he was correct outside of one isolated situation. He's a DD hound along the lines of Tonto. I do DD, but Mike's has always been orders of magnitude more thorough than mine.
Oh I am not questioning his DD, he can obtain data far beyond the levels of mere mortals like you and I, it is what he DOES with that data that I am questioning, if you could do a halt short strategy as i suggested and get filthy rich would you not do it? All the while claiming to sae the people in the company you KNOW you have shorted and can halt if necessary.
If Mike only speaks when he's got something negative to say, I don't know what that might mean.
Remember Occums Razor? Is negative data good for shorters or for long players? It is good for shorters, if you could have access to the info that mike has and find halt potentials that the SEC has missed, why would you go long and risk losing money, when you could go short and WIN almost 100% of the time?
The fact that he's almost always been right, though, is exactly why I listen to him.
Awfully good DD there isn;t it, especially when he supplies the SEC with whateve they need to enact a halt, it may not be illegal, but I consider it unethical and I do not think the SEC would like to be the pawns of a short seller. |
