SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric who wrote (69094)3/19/2016 10:42:57 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 86350
 
FOBE eRICO babbling on again. Water vapor also absorbs at 12-13 micrometers and so many other wavelength that each molecule is a hundred times the absorber of CO2. And in the tropics there are hundreds of water vapor molecules for every CO2 molecule. I've taken the time to find traceable data and annotated for clarity. So is anyone surprised a anonymous poster of anonymous information must ignore it?

Some folks are so delusional or stupid the cannot see how micro powerful CO2 is to H20 in absorbing longwave radiation. Water vapor varies by thousands of parts per million hourly and EDA causes the blocking of energy several orders of magnitude of power nullifying all green house gases.

The only science basis of CO2 effects are in models that cannot hindcast temperature or any ocean current or wind or heating or area cooling events. Any model that cannot hindcast is just an idiots guide of prediction.

This is a nist overlay of CO2 and H20 Transmittance followed by the massive variation in atmospheric H20 vapor.




Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News