| | | Muskavite You posted:
Show me the person other than Bruce Duncan that miller is hydrothermal graphite. Miller is amphorous period. Please prove me wrong. Musky.
I think you are on to something here.
Not only has BD fooled his shareholders, SGS and Evans Analytical, he appears to have successfully pulled the wool over the eyes of a bunch of so called "international experts".
Excerpted from the CCB NR of Sep 30, 2015
....Miller hydrothermal lump/vein graphite has been selected to be fully characterized as a Standard Reference Material for the chemical analysis of nuclear grade graphites and manufactured carbons by the Subcommittee D02.F0 on Manufactured Carbon and Graphite Products of ASTM International, which has a current primary focus on developing internationally recognized test methods for comprehensive characterization of graphite and manufactured carbon materials used in nuclear and other high-technology applications.
The Subcommittee, composed of international experts in specialty graphite and manufactured carbon materials research and development, includes leading scientists from the UK National Nuclear Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US), representatives of other international governments and academic institutions, graphite end-users, and producers of specialty carbon products.
Great piece of detective work Muskie.
PS: What is amphorous?
Are you suggesting CCB stores its graphite in amphoras?
Or is it similar to amorphous? |
|
