Copper Fox Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: louel who wrote (10131)	4/15/2016 7:58:53 PM
From: specboy2012	Read Replies (1) of 10654

So in essence Point 4 in this explanation on the MTO website while is there to absolve them from liabilities its rather a mute point? I agree totally in that there is legal recourse above the MTO office saying there isn't. This could rewrite mining history in BC . 67 (1) In this section, "intervening claim" means a claim that is in respect of land that was subject to a forfeited claim or an expired lease and is registered in the period between (a) the date the record of the forfeited claim or expired lease was deleted from the registry, and (b) the date the chief gold commissioner makes an order in respect of the forfeiture or expiry under subsection (2). (2) Even if a claim is forfeited or a lease expires under this Act because the recorded holder fails to comply with a requirement of this Act within a time limit, the chief gold commissioner, by order, may set aside the forfeiture or the effect of the expiry and allow a further period of time for compliance. (3) The chief gold commissioner, under section 6.36, may delete an intervening claim from the registry. (4) No legal proceeding lies or may be commenced or maintained, and no compensation is payable, in respect of a deletion under subsection (3).

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next