Copper Fox Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: brundall who wrote (10132)	4/15/2016 9:24:28 PM
From: mahzman2	2 Recommendations Recommended By Hog Head Underhill69 of 10654

Looks like they spent more time and priority on covering their butts on the CXM website, then they all did maintaining the claims. To have Elmer and Michael's names dropped and then added back to the website must have been just a timing coincidence, eh! No one at CXM takes any responsibility for this major mistake. No one is fired on the spot. Well at least the cautionary note in the NR sounded familiar: There is no guarantee that the application to the Chief Gold Commissioner for British Columbia will be successful or result in any or all of the mineral claims being returned to CarMax. Unbelievable. What makes this even worse is I am sure that I am like many who invested in CF - we invested because of Schaft Creek and not this bs and the AZ projects. If I had wanted to invest in a project like CXM which many, many years way from any potential development, then I would have. None of these projects have brought any value to us and have only caused dilution and more possible dilution or worse. What is next for this horror show?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next