SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: L. D. who wrote (1377)12/29/1997 5:43:00 PM
From: L. D.  Read Replies (1) of 5164
 
I had been reading some old posts to sort of relieve the agony that we all went through during the past 10 months, and on the eve of resumption of trading I would like to remind you all what was the cause of our misery. D.H. explains it best in the post below and I hope you people will make it a "Pure, red, burning Hell" for shorts in their attempt to cover their short position. It's up to us to limit the supply of sought-after paper. Good luck and be strong.

Subject: SUN GOLD GAMING

| Previous | Next | Respond |

To: Jesse (1234 )
From: Donald R. Harris
Friday, Oct 24 1997 9:49PM EST
Reply # of 1392

ATTENTION ATTENTION ATTENTION

This is Ancient History, It's not 1997 or 1996 it's February& March 1995.You can
sure make history say anything you want.The fact is the short swere having their way
with the stock, first helping it run up to the $8.00 range then shorting it into the
sewer.They got it down to $1.89 when support showed up that took it back up to the
$4.00 range.
Isn't it strange that they never get after the shorts who maliciously attack a small
company, but the minute you try to support a stock (meaning getting in their way) your
the bad guy.
The short Saboteurs attack Sungold 4 or 5 times between 1994 and Jan. 1997.The
aforementioned stand off of 1994-1995 was significant, as the shorts were successful
in shorting the stock down to a new low of $ 1.89.Fortunately the shorts were held off
and the stock resumed a normal trading pattern between $2.25 and $3.50 from spring
of 1995 to fall of 1996,when Sggnf Corporate development started to come together
in Korea and Michigan.By this time SGGNF had attracted hundreds of new Brokers
and thousands of new share holders, and the shorts could no longer contain the share
prices.Angrily they shorted more at $3-4-5-6 and very heavy at $9 &
$10.Undisturbed,the market continued to reflect the Corp. Development Of SGGNF
and move to as high as CA$19.50.

SURPRISE SURPRISE the VSE began to halt the stock indiscriminantly.
Subsequently,SGGNF has been vindicated time and time again by it's Business
Partners,KPMG,Marquette Advisors,Gilmore & CO.,Merit Investors and several
International Legal Firms retained by Merit, and the shorts remain unapologetic.

Lets see the shorts buy their shares the good old fashion way,through the market like
we all have to.

I suspect the Corporate fundamentals are even going to get better and the short sellers
problems are going to grow larger.

HE WHO MAKES THE RULES, WINS THE GAME.

Buy leaving their slanted playing field, they have to start playing by NASDAQ rules,
and they don't like it.

Are they angry YES .Are they going to take this lying down NO.They will pull out all
stops,and stoop to new lows(if that is possible). You can expect more negative articles
, ALL THEY WANT IS YOUR CHEEP STOCK,and then they will go away.Some
of you will play right into their hands. THEY WIN ,YOU LOOSE.

It's easy being a short, all you have to do is say BOO and you get all the cheep stock
you need.Well their NOT going to get mine.I hope they don't get yours.

GOOD LUCK TO US ALL
Donald R. Harris

| Previous | Next | Respond |

View SubjectMarks
Bookmark this Subject

Return to Casinos/Gaming

One or more words separated by spaces:

Subject Titles Only
Full-Text
Messages with Links
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext