This is a deleted post from elsewhere, they love to try to hide them don't they. THE SCAMMERS. Good read to see the manipulation going on. Now why would someone create, delete, modify articles if they weren't trying to scam people? Why are the hubbers trying to hide this stuff?
Check out this Linda Rogers name. It is on several different web pages that look similar but with different names at the top!
Here are some links, notice the grammer! Anyone want to know who all those people are let me know!
stockcaller.com
smallcapwired.com
clintongazette.com
Here is my reply to loneranger, no really, LONE ranger hahahaha!
You are not at all factual. The content of my post was pointing out that the BODY of the article was changed from it's original form. Your reply stating that the title is factual is of no relevance. The title of an article is ONE with the body of the article.
The original article was published by Franklin Independent. Here is a paste from the original. Yes we have a copy and it was sent to authorities. Nothing can ever be deleted once it has been put on the internet.
Nanoviricides Incorporated (NYSEMKT:NNVC) Short Interest Increased By 10.34%
by Franklin Staff Contributor — March 25, 2016
The stock of Nanoviricides Incorporated (NYSEMKT:NNVC) registered an increase of 10.34% in short interest. NNVC’s total short interest was 1.73M shares in March as published by FINRA. Its up 10.34% from 1.56M shares, reported previously. With 287,800 shares average volume, it will take short sellers 6 days to cover their NNVC’s short positions.
Here is the article released on April 8th by smallcapwired.
Nanoviricides Incorporated (NYSEMKT:NNVC) Shorted Shares Increased By 10.34%
by Linda Rogers — April 8, 2016
The stock of Nanoviricides Incorporated (NYSEMKT:NNVC) registered an increase of 10.34% in short interest. NNVC’s total short interest was 1.73M shares in April as published by FINRA. Its up 10.34% from 1.56M shares, reported previously. With 287,800 shares average volume, it will take short sellers 6 days to cover their NNVC’s short positions.
As I pointed out in my post, the deception is in the body of the article. The original article from Franklin (notice the striking similarities of franklins webpage and smallcapwired webpage) states that the percentage 10.34 and the 1.73M shares are in MARCH, which is factual. The smallcapwired re release dated April 8th replaced the word March with April. That is not only deceptive it is illegal. After posting that I sent this to the authorities, the date of Franklin article was modified to April 4th and the body of the article was changed to match the Smallcapwired, changing the word March to April.
here is a paste...Yes this too is still available
(Now if nothing nefarious is going on why are these articles being modified and deleted?)
Nanoviricides Incorporated (NYSEMKT:NNVC) Short Interest Increased By 10.34%
by Franklin Staff Contributor — April 4, 2016
The stock of Nanoviricides Incorporated (NYSEMKT:NNVC) registered an increase of 10.34% in short interest. NNVC’s total short interest was 1.73M shares in April as published by FINRA. Its up 10.34% from 1.56M shares, reported previously. With 287,800 shares average volume, it will take short sellers 6 days to cover their NNVC’s short positions.
As I stated above, the title of an article is one with the body of the article. The title claims that the short percentage and share amount is current as the body of the article states APRIL. The FACT is that those numbers apply to MARCH and not APRIL as was originally released on the ORIGINAL article dated March 25th.
Pointing out the title as you did and claiming it as factual is the equivalent of stating this is factual...
TITANIC SINKS - GREAT LOSS OF LIFE! April 8th 2016
At 2:20 a.m. on April 8, 2016 (modifying the original from the actual date of April 15, 1912), the British ocean liner Titanic sinks into the North Atlantic Ocean about 400 miles south of Newfoundland, Canada. The massive ship, which carried 2,200 passengers and crew, had struck an iceberg two and half hours before.
Seriously?
The deception is clear, the connection between Franklin and Smallcapwired has been established and is also clear. The activity is illegal whether you protest it or not.
To our new NNVC board poster Carini.
Looking for investment advice on NNVC. Consider this. Most if not all the longs on here have at one point or another stated that they would like to see something different happen with the company, they are not comfortable with a certain direction or whatever. The longs are very clear that there is a possibility that the company does not achieve it's goals. The opposing side has not once, ever, stated anything positive or hopeful about the company at all. They continue to post that it is a 100 percent certainty that nothing will come of NNVC based on, I might add, the fact that they have not produced a drug for clinical trials (yet). This logic can be applied to every situation in human history and is completely invalid. This logic states that if anyone were to have delays (the fact that it is one year 5 year 11 years or 30 years is irrelevant) and not accomplish what they are attempting to achieve then they cannot for certainty EVER achieve it. Absurd!
When someone continuously has no opposing possibility to their argument and no matter what is achieved it is downplayed then, in my opinion, that would be the last person on earth to take advice from. For instance, if one were to argue that 'scale up' can never be achieved and then it is achieved then a person to be trusted would say 'wow, I stand corrected, even though I still think they won't succeed, I concede that they accomplished something that I 'emphatically' stated they could not achieve so maybe, just maybe, I am wrong about them, time will tell. This Never happens no matter what they achieve, watch what happens when the universities report soon. They will not concede that the universities are a validation of the science. It is going to happen real soon and then everyone who has ever glimpsed over here, will know who is who on this message board.
Frankly, I recommend to do your own due diligence and invest on the confidence of those findings. |
