NanoViricides Professional Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : NanoViricides Professional

NNVC 1.720

+3.6%

9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: mjjones	4/19/2016 4:50:49 PM
	of 27

POST DELETED FROM YOU KNOW WHERE! awww did the losers not know how to respond to a grown up so they had to delete this? LOL! I have most of the 'hey look over here' crowd blocked but seeing your reply it looks like the commercialization argument is still alive. lol! The English language is pretty simple and by definition they have unmatched successful experience in the discovery, development and commercialization of anti viral therapeutics. No other company has ever had this much success in animal models at killing viruses. No other company has successfully scaled up manufacturing of a virus killing nano medicine. Since commercialization can be the act of 'commercializing for sale', the mere fact that they can produce enough of the product at the plant to eventually sell, warrants using that word. If I had an R&D lab testing magic carpets (which some people like to analogize), sent them out to independent labs and they work carrying mice. Then I open a manufacturing plant to scale up the size and qty, I can then state that I have an R&D plant and a commercial plant. I don't have to be selling yet to state that. If someone said, 'what does your company do'? I would have to say that we have unmatched successful experience in the discovery, development and commercialization of magic carpets. The difference from this analogy and anyone else's use of it is that the analogy can only be applied to a pattern of speech and not an analogy of fact. Saying NNVC is as close to making cides as I would be to making magic carpets is ridiculous. I am not now, nor have I ever even attempted to make a magic carpet. I do not have a degree in aeronautics. I do not have any experience in the field of aeronautics. Other than possibly making a paper aeroplane, I have no knowledge whatsoever in the field. I do not have a lab. I do not own any equipment in any way pertaining to the field of aeronautics. I have never spent one minute of my time other that using it as an analogy on the topic of flying carpets. I do not even own a carpet store, in fact I have never even laid carpet. NNVC however has people with an education in the field of medicine, many of them. Many of them have tested the cides in their independent labs and invested in the company due to the results. NNVC has an R&D facility and a manufacturing plant. NNVC has spent many years working with and perfecting the product and it's manufacturing processes so as to be able to claim that they are commercializing anti viral therapeutics. See how the magic carpet analogy makes about as much sense as a chocolate kettle?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next