SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zax who wrote (931260)4/20/2016 1:17:52 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (3) of 1574852
 
Zax,
Springsteen has zero obligation to conduct business in the state. Again, a moronic argument. The baker has no obligation to conduct business in the state, or for that matter this country, either.
The baker has no obligation to serve a couple of gay customers, yet said customers won a lawsuit that amounted to six figures. All because the baker, like Bruce Springsteen, wanted to follow their own beliefs.

Like I said, I don't believe the bathroom laws are necessary. That's just government butting into issues that they shouldn't have to in the first place. Sexual harassment is already a crime, and there's nothing special about transgendered people using bathrooms of their choice that puts anyone as risk. At least in my view.

But all of the righteous indignation, all of the stupid memes, all of the boycotts, all of the fake outrage over these laws, tells me that people like you really do believe in special privileges for the transgendered. I even see people now believing that sex and gender are two different things. I don't know if you believe that, but this tells me that people want to bend reality to cater to the transgendered and to their own belief that discrimination is the real evil here.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext