SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Pitera who wrote (18158)4/25/2016 7:53:38 AM
From: The Ox2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Hawkmoon
kathtoo

  Read Replies (2) of 33421
 
I still believe negative interest rates are a very temporary accommodation. Similar to all the QEs we had here in the US, where the only purpose (IMO) was to shore up and put a new (more solid) foundation under the banking industry (regardless of what the talking heads say), NIRP will not last long elsewhere.

Especially within the near term future, as the US will likely raise rates again (relatively soon).
Negative interest rates "are the stupidest idea I have ever experienced," the newspaper Finanz und Wirtschaft quoted Gundlach as saying on its website on Saturday.

"The next major event (for financial markets) will be the moment when central banks in Japan and in Europe give up and cancel the experiment."
It's interesting to me that he characterizes this as an experiment. I'd say it's more of a "painted themselves into a corner" move and won't last long at all. I find it hard to believe we are in a "one and done" scenario with FED rates. Whether or not Gundlach is simply talking his book is hard to gauge, although I suspect that's the case here. He's certainly been one of the more vocal "doom and gloomers" lately.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext