Robert, it is legitimate to talk about price/performance. The PSC1000 may or may not offer better price/performance than the Sun chips. It may or may not provide a price point that isn't even offered by Sun.
But that is not the issue I have addressed, is it? The issue I have taken up, although proven using technical evidence, is not fundamentally a technical one, but an issue of credibility. Does the processor do what the company says it does in their press releases or not? I say that it does not, and that the company itself is willing to point you to the evidence to the contrary.
Given that, I think you have to very carefully examine anything the company tells you.
When you try to divert the discussion to price/performance or some other issue, you are just ducking this issue of credibility.
"Aw, heck, who cares if the company tells the truth or not? The bottom line is whether the chip does a better job or not!"
Problem is, who ya gonna beleive about whether or not it does the job better, if you can't even get straight talk about exactly what it does? |
