The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jlallen who wrote (2923)	4/26/2016 5:30:40 PM
From: TimF	of 3029

And if there really was any such duty (which is a silly idea), if the idea somehow created massive pressure for a vote, the nominee could just be rejected quickly, while if Obama tried to place Garland in office by himself he would face the outright opposition of both of the other branches of government (I know the court is 4-4 right now but even the liberals wouldn't go along with that kind of crap, and also while Roberts has no more power as a judge then the other justices he has administrative authority that is relevant here). This isn't the first case under Obama where the left tried to argue that congress had a constitutional duty to act the way they want it to act. Its seems it gets more ridiculous each time.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next