In other words, those "sound bites" are inaccurate, but that's OK, because the investors know better.
Or, it's OK to fib, as long as your investors are smart enough to know you are fibbing.
If you don't think that that's OK, then stop perpetrating the fib by speaking in sound-bites about the PSC1000 being a "Java processor", which it isn't. It wasn't designed to be one, and it isn't one, plain and simple. It was, in fact, designed to be a Forth processor.
Somewhere along the line somebody slapped some Java marketing spin on it, and it stuck.
The PSC1000 may well be "an excellent processor for Java applications", "ideally suited for executing Java byte code", may "greatly simpilfy the design of just-in-time compilers", etc. etc. etc. (I'm not commenting one way or another whether or not it is.) Why not use these more accurate terms in your sound bites? (I address this to both you and the company.) |
