SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (934727)5/13/2016 12:14:38 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (3) of 1571206
 
Brumar,
If he'd incited him, he would have shot him BEFORE he was on top of him pounding his head MMA style.
Not necessarily. He could have incited Trayvon, feeling secure that if things got out of hand, he can just shoot him.

Things got out of hand. He shot him.

The whole point was that all of this was completely unnecessary. If Zimmerman didn't have the gun, he probably wouldn't have approached Trayvon in the first place. Instead, he would call the cops.

But no, the cops are too slow. "Fucking punks. These assholes they always get away." Might as well go Charles Bronson on them.

I'm not saying that Zimmerman should have been banned from having a gun in the first place, nor am I saying that Zimmerman hunted Trayvon down and murdered him in cold blood.

I am saying, however, that by possessing a gun, Zimmerman felt free to make choices that escalated into the death of a teenager. These were not sound choices.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News