SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A New Age In Gold Refining

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael J. Wendell who wrote (372)12/30/1997 12:16:00 PM
From: Kurt R.  Read Replies (2) of 672
 
Mr. Wendell, thank you for your most informative posts. You made a recent comment about the Franklin Lake ore and the Johnson Lett technology. I it appears that you are not the only one being skeptical about the viability of grinding large amounts of ore down to 1,000 mesh. The finest mesh size mentioned in any reference book I was able to find is 325. As I understand it, mesh size is defined as the amount of openings per inch in a screen. Well, it is really hard to imagine a screen with 1000 openings per linear inch; let alone one through which you can pass tons of ore per day.

Unfortunately, Naxos has not done a very good job answering previous questions on this matter. My speculation is that in the JL process, the ore might be ground in one pass only, but not screened. In this case nobody would know for sure if we are dealing with 100 mesh or 1,000 mesh.

Another thought is that clay by definition is composed of particles smaller than 2 microns (is that roughly 1,000 mesh?). So by processing only the (presumably) gold bearing clay fraction of the ore, the comminution might not be a full fledged grinding process, but rather the breaking apart clusters of loosely agglomerated particles, akin to crushing a sugar cube.

It would be interesting to read your opinion on this and on the JL process in general.

Kurt Reschner
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext