| | | From my perspective, Trump's views on Muslim migration and illegal immigration to the United States represent a step in the right direction for the nation. In contrast, all other candidates represent enormous strides in a disastrous direction.
Succinctly, multiculturalism and diversity are toxic to Whites in North America and Europe. I think that Europe and North America would be far better continents if both were inhabited solely by Whites. That doesn't mean that I hate other races and ethnicities, or that I believe that all non-Whites are "bad" and that all Whites are "good" -- I do not.
Factually speaking, North America and Europe would be far safer, cleaner, and wholesome without the debilitating and deleterious effects of constant racial animosity, strife, turmoil, and the perpetual chaos associated with the presence of non-Whites. If the United States were a Whites-only nation, it would be the very best nation in the world, by far. Every metric in existence verifies this point beyond a shadow of a doubt. Of course, I don't say these things in a hateful or mean-spirited way. My comments are based purely on empirical and anecdotal facts, which no one can honestly refute.
In the same vein, many prominent world leaders are on record as asserting that multiculturalism is an abject failure. They're correct. In fact, the truth is that no one can provide a single example of how mixed-race societies are superior to mono-race/mono-ethnic societies. If someone can, I challenge you to speak up and debate the point, but without the usual name-calling and other hateful vitriol often employed by leftists.
Some will undoubtedly claim that my comments are racist, but if one stops to think for a moment, it is clear that everyone is a racist to some degree. Racism is quite natural, in fact. A Rasmussen poll from a couple of years ago revealed that even Blacks acknowledged that Blacks are the most racist people in the United States.
Let's also consider those who advocate and facilitate migration from non-White countries to White countries. They are clearly racists, because their basic premise ranges from (a) non-Whites can function much better in the presence of Whites, to (b) non-Whites must be in the presence of Whites to survive. Think about how racist both views are, yet that is absolutely what leftists (and RINOs) who advocate migration and illegal immigration are espousing at the root-level. They are essentially telling non-Whites that they cannot survive without Whites, while simultaneously telling Whites that non-Whites cannot survive without us.
Back to Trump... I strongly support Trump, I've voted for him, and I will vote for him again in November because he represents an initial step in the right direction, whereas all other candidates from both parties advocate enormous strides in the wrong direction. Of course,if Trump were confronted by someone from the media who pointedly said, "Look at what some of your supporters believe," he would undoubtedly have to denigrate comments such as mine. It's understandable in the modern political climate where those who challenge the "merits" of multiculturalism and diversity are cast as pariahs. At least Trump is changing the discussion regarding illegals and Muslims. It's definitely a step in the right direction, and hopefully the first on many great strides in the right direction someday. |
|