SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
PKRBKR
To: Brumar89 who wrote (938025)6/3/2016 1:18:35 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 1574054
 
Elon Musk: Humanity “Probably” Living in a Matrix like Computer Simulation

Eric Worrall / 9 hours ago June 2, 2016

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Green Entrepreneur Elon Musk has claimed that it is almost certain that we all live in a Matrix style computer simulation. But there is a vital piece missing from his conjecture.

Now, 40 years later we have photorealistic, 3D simulations with millions of people playing simultaneously, and it’s getting better every year. Soon we’ll have virtual reality, augmented reality.

If you assume any rate of improvement at all, then the games will become indistinguishable from reality, even if that rate of advancement drops by a thousand from what it is now. Then you just say, okay, let’s imagine it’s 10,000 years in the future, which is nothing on the evolutionary scale.

So given that we’re clearly on a trajectory to have games that are indistinguishable from reality, and those games could be played on any set-top box or on a PC or whatever, and there would probably be billions of such computers or set-top boxes, it would seem to follow that the odds we’re in base reality is one in billions.

Read more: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/02/elon-musk-one-in-billions-chance-we-arent-living-in-a-matrix-style-computer-simulation/

So what is the flaw with Elon Musk’s theory?

Lets call Musks’s conjecture theory one, and consider some other theories (from a previous post). See if you can pick the odd one out.

2. The buildup of anthropogenic carbon dioxide may lead to dangerous climate change, not because CO2 is a particularly powerful greenhouse gas, but because the slight warming caused by excess CO2 will cause sea water to evaporate, filling the atmosphere with water vapour. Water vapour is a far more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2. The evaporation of water vapour will trigger a chain reaction, a runaway greenhouse effect, in which global warming caused by the evaporation of ever increasing amounts of sea water forces yet more sea water to evaporate. In Dr. James Hansen’s words, “The oceans will begin to boil”.

3. We have already been visited by aliens, who most likely continue to monitor us. The alternative is to believe the preposterous proposition that we are the only intelligent life inhabiting any of the planets circling our galaxy’s 100 billion stars. The reason this must be true – all we have to do is look in the mirror. In a few decades, or at most a few centuries, humans will have the technology to mass produce and launch tiny space probes. Probes which can visit other stars, and transmit information back to us.

Such probes are already on the drawing board.

NASA Relativistic Interstellar Laser Launcher: We could do it NOW, for the cost of the NASA Climate Budget

Since the probes we shall build will be incredibly small, it will be possible to launch them at relativistic velocities, for trivial economic cost. Scientists have even discovered ways such probes could be steered and decelerated as they approach their destination, using the Galactic magnetic field.

If just one group of intelligent aliens in our galaxy of 100 billion stars reached our level of technology, at least half a million years ago, and made the decision to send out such space probes, then there has already been enough time for their high speed probes to reach our star system, and report back what they found.

4. Human lives are in danger right now, from asteroids and comets flying through space. As the shock advent of the Chelyabinsk meteor demonstrated, Earth can be struck unexpectedly at any time by meteors and other space bodies, many of which have the potential to cause widespread devastation. The Chelyabinsk meteor detonated with a force of 500 kilotons of TNT – it is only due to good fortune that the explosion, which caused some buildings to collapse and widespread damage and injuries from breaking glass, did not cause serious loss of life.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelyabinsk_meteor

Which theory stands out from the other theories? The answer of course is the fourth theory. Unlike the other theories, the theory that the Earth is at risk of being struck by a dangerous meteor is based on observational evidence. The other theories, however compelling they seem, are just conjecture.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/06/02/elon-musk-humanity-probably-living-in-a-matrix-like-computer-simulation/

Terry Gednalske says:

June 2, 2016 at 10:46 pm
If we are living in a simulated world, then even if using fossil fuels is “harmful”, we are not really harming anything real!

[ We only THINK we're using FF's. They aren't real, just sim FF's. ]

Analitik says:
June 3, 2016 at 2:29 am

All 3 are more plausible than Tesla and SolarCity ever being profitable without subsidies.

His virtual reality concept is actually the “Better Than Life” scenario from Red Dwarf by Grant Naylor. Just another example where Enron/L Ron Musk is not the innovator he pretends to be.

Reality will smack him hard when his ponzi schemes fold after the election.

charles nelson says:
June 3, 2016 at 1:20 am
Elon Musk has received 4.9 BILLION dollars of taxpayers money, which makes him a lot cleverer than most of us.
I think he might be onto something here.

Reply
AndyG55 says:

June 3, 2016 at 2:58 am

I think he should be asked to pay a substantial percentage of that back.

He has plenty, courtesy of the US taxpayer,

Its well passed time he was called to account for that money.

Reply

Analitik says:
June 3, 2016 at 4:01 am

He thinks he is Neo disrupting The Matrix so in his virtual view of reality, he’ll never be called on it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext