<<Mike, I see the neighborhood thugs have given you their typically warm Tpro welcome.>>
Interesting. We can't express skepticism of Mike Winn's faith basis for his statements, but he can express sketpcism about our motives?
<<You must see we can't use your type here.
Somebody who is honest, decent and knows what he is talking about.>>
It's obvious you aren't talking about Mike Winn, and Diogenes doesn't post here.
<<But that said I guess there are a few of us who are really perverse and would like to hear something other then mindless bombast and rah rah. >>
I see, so before Winn arrived, every post was mindless bombast. I demand to know which planet you are from!
<<As for those of you who are attacking Mike, talk about stupid.
Here is somebody who directly works with embedded processors,
knows what he is talking about and you are trying to drive him off the thread.>>
How do you know he works directly with embedded processors, just becasue he says so? You'll blindly accept his representations, but the rest of us are mindless bombasters. Sorry Rich, we have to prove our arguments, same applies to Mike Winn.
<<I want to know why he doesn't think year 2k is such a big deal and how he answers the above questions as well as some that others have posed. >>
The only fair thing you have said so far. Agreed.
<<In case some of you have forgotten, according to Jenkins, when this
yr 2k issue was first discussed at Tpro early this year there was internal dissension as to whether or not it was a real problem.
So it appears that somebody can be expert in this area and in good faith believe there is not that big a problem.>>
Agreed. But Mike Winn has posted alot of garbage after being offered a chance to explain himself. He is an empty windbag. You can wait for something more substantive if you wish.
<<Mike keep posting.>>
Isn't democracy wonderful? Read some Tocqueville.
<<I will certainly listen to what you have to say.
I know there are others who are interested.>>
Name one besides Toothfairy.
<<By the way this does not preclude the possibility that Tpro is also hyping the problem.>>
Huh? Have you been following this thread at all? You can't get management much more credible. Sure, there is a probability that ANYTHING may be true, but you don't press over 30K CD ROMS in a hype campaign, and you don't take engineers off money making projects to write time consuming and intricate software. You hire competent, verbally agile PR people. And Lelios ain't that .
DocStone |
