SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles Hughes who wrote (15626)12/30/1997 7:51:00 PM
From: Greg Jung  Read Replies (1) of 24154
 
Chaz, I've looked on a few of the msft SI groups and
this appears to be the conversation closest to the point I'd
make, so correct me if it is in error or inadequate:

Offering a broken-only "uninstalled IE4" system is a blatant defiance of a simple request, there is no complication whatsoever in the "decoupling" except as the age-old shared .DLL problem.
IE4 uses .dll's to accomplish in functionality. .DLL's which will
likely be useful elsewhere. .dll's which are kept in the system-wide
universally used - every tom, dick, and harry can write here,
directory. An "uninstall" program for any application has to
account for the fact that the files it "added" may have already been
in this directory and it need not (and should not) remove them to de-install itself. Windows for years has this problem.
So the reason the OS breaks is IE4 uninstall says, "I'm taking my ball and bat and gloves and go home", thus deleting e.g. the file A6gyt89.dll which include the function (hypothetical) "move_block(from, to, count)" which the Excel writers have found to
be convenient (and a useful way to prevent Excel '99 from working under Windows '95).

That is the extent of the "mind-boggling inextricable link" of IE4
to the "OS", is it not? Or is there another technical explanation
of the linkage that is more forgiving to msft?

Greg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext