SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (941329)6/19/2016 2:06:01 AM
From: John2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Investor Clouseau
slowmo

  Read Replies (2) of 1573247
 
Good point.

Yes, it was a good point, and that's the most intelligent comment that you've posted, but then you ruined it by continuing to post.

But table 43 doesn't support your position either. Despite your claims.

Yes, it completely supports the facts that I've posted, but you are not intelligent enough to figure it out, so allow me to connect the dots for you. Pay attention...

First, let's establish the U.S. population by race in 2014.

On July 1, 2014, the Census Bureau estimated that the U.S. population of Whites was about 246,660,710. Likewise, the U.S. population of Blacks was estimated at about 42,158,238. The estimates of both races also include the respective populations of Hispanic ethnicity within both races (e.g., White Hispanics and Black Hispanics). The data can be verified here [1]. The data indicate that Whites outnumbered Blacks by 5.851 to 1 in 2014. In other words, the White population was about 5.851 times the Black population in 2014.

Now, let's refer to Table 43 of the FBI UCR of 2014. In the table, refer to the crime arrest category labeled "Robbery", which is one of the 30 categories of crime arrests that the FBI tracks. Again, the table is located here [2].

Table 43 indicates that 31,354 Whites were reportedly arrested for robbery in 2014, whereas 41,379 Blacks were reportedly arrested for robbery.

Notice that although Whites outnumbered Blacks by 5.851 to 1 in 2014, Blacks were still arrested for robbery at 1.32 times the number of White arrests! That is known as a raw comparison, but it is not a proportional comparison because of the disparity in the two population sizes. Ergo, for a proportional comparison, it is necessary to set the respective populations of the two races equal to 1. In other words, how would the robbery arrests manifest if the Black population were equal to the White population? There are numerous ways to solve this problem mathematically and arrive at the correct answer, but let's just pick one. We can simply multiply the number of Blacks arrested for robbery in 2014 by the White population multiple of 5.851. So, in a Black population of 246,660,710, which is the same as the White population in 2014, the number of Blacks arrested for robbery would total about 242,101 instead of 41,379. That is a staggering 7.72 times the number of White arrests, as the table below clearly shows!

Regarding the other 29 categories of crime, the same mathematical procedure is used to determine the Black arrest rates for each one.

The only category where Whites were arrested at a slightly-higher rate than Blacks was for DUI, but that is only because Hispanic arrests were lumped in with White (and Black) arrests. Once the Hispanic DUI rates are removed from both, the Black arrest rate for DUI would also easily surpass the White arrest rate.



If you still don't understand the concept of proportionality and the other basic math involved, ask someone else to explain it to you. I do not care to continue educating you with subject matter that you should have learned and mastered in elementary school.

Likewise, if you still deny that Black arrest rates dwarf White arrest rates, you are clueless and dense beyond hope.

1. census.gov
2. fbi.gov

---

Unfortunately, you continued to post more nonsense in your response...

So, two tables. Neither support your position.

Do you realize how stupid that sounds? The table that you posted earlier was completely erroneous as you've since admitted, so it is ridiculous to repeat your baseless assertion that it wouldn't support my position. It had nothing to do with my position. It was part of an erroneous post that you made, so stop projecting your error onto me. The fact that you brought up your erroneous table again, after admitting that it was a mistake, speaks volumes about your lack of intelligence.

Or your graph. Yet you claim it does.

It clearly supports my position. You simply do not have the intelligence to understand it.

You are beyond clueless. You are delusional in your hate.

You have clearly demonstrated that you lack the intelligence and education to engage in any serious dialog on the subject. The best that you can do is respond with name-calling, and fake charges of racism, etc. That's very typical of leftist mentality and misbehavior.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext