Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (942873)	6/26/2016 1:22:54 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 1575181

What the Democrats are fighting for will not disarm terrorists, but may disarm some law abiding citizens. To the extent that's looked at through a "right to life" prism it harms the right to life. in order to purchase a car, you must have insurance False, or at least generally false. Also cat ownership isn't a direct constitutional right (you could argue its vaguely and indirectly covered by the 9th and the 10th amendments, esp. against federal restriction, but that's an argument for a libertarian and/or federalist reading of the constitution in general, not specifically a right to own a car) For the victims of shootings, large and small, where has their right to life gone? Assuming it wasn't a justified shooting, the right was violated by the shooter. You would have future potential victims be disarmed against those who would similarly violate their right to life. So you would strip their ability to protect their right to life, while also violating their 2nd amendment rights, and their fifth and sixth amendment rights as well.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next