2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 414.48

+0.7%

Jan 9 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Vosilla who wrote (120899)	7/16/2016 5:55:25 PM
From: GPS Info	Read Replies (2) of 219221

A dual income household making $15 an hour can still do quite well in middle America where wealth and income inequality isn't too severe. Something no one ever seems to talk about. I've thought about this from time to time. There are higher population densities along the coasts. Given that the east coast was settled first and then migration started west, the east coast has had more time to develop universities and large corporations than the mid-west. The south was devastated during the Civil War and needed time to heal before returning to higher income levels. The west-coast could be developed more quickly with shipping lanes for immigrants and then for greater and faster trading with other states and countries. If you look at US university rankings, the large majority of top schools are along the coasts, and these are also top ranked in the world. Does it make sense that more of these better-educated, competitive and driven people are able to have greater incomes? We are also starting with a larger pool of students to select from along the coasts. usnews.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next